Great House Farm Wiki — Research Mirror

EV-0105 — Western Mail report: “Farmer fails in final eviction hearing”

page · Updated 2026-10-20T14:38:34 · Original source

EV IDEV-0105
TitleWestern Mail report: “Farmer fails in final eviction hearing”
Date of document6 December 1988
Typepress
Evidence labelPRESS REPORT
Repository / referenceBuckler family evidence repository; WordPress Media Library item 1329; Google Drive file 1478915_10201438082894092…jpg. Western Mail, 6 December 1988. No archive link verified. Cross-reference GHF-E027-07 (historical research only).
StatusHELD — open the scan (image)
ProvenanceWestern Mail cutting annotated “Western Mail 6 Dec 1988”, Buckler family evidence repository; Transcribed on Press Archive page N10. Newspaper page not yet obtained.
Wiki catalogue pageGHF-E090-N10
Claims that rely on thisCadw — Forensic Assessment v8.0.0 (full text), Court of Appeal — Forensic Assessment, European Commission of Human Rights / Strasbourg — Forensic Assessment, European Court of Human Rights / ECHR Archives — Forensic Assessment, Event Nomenclature Register — 1988 Great House Farm removal, seizure and occupat, Evidence Library, High Court — Forensic Assessment, House of Lords — Forensic Assessment, Media Gallery, National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) — Forensic Assessment, Press Archive — Newspaper Transcripts, Press Articles Index — every newspaper cutting and press extract, one page each (+1 more)

About this page type → Read the Docs

Quotation: But after a hearing in chambers a judge at Cardiff Crown Court dismissed an application by Mr and Mrs Buckler for an injunction to restrain BP Properties Ltd, the owners of the land, from destroying or damaging the fabric of the building.

Proves: Western Mail reported, 6 Dec 1988, a judge dismissed the Bucklers’ injunction application against BP Properties Ltd; Cadw said the house lacked sufficient architectural merit, land lacked archaeological interest.

Does not prove: Journalist’s summary, not the judgment; Court identity disputed (Crown Court vs High Court per N11); Reported age (800 years) and four generations of occupation unconfirmed.

Browse mirror index