Great House Farm Wiki — Research Mirror

Damages, Losses & Costs Quantification

page · Updated 2026-10-20T14:38:09 · Original source

Page ID: 5298 · Title: Damages, Losses & Costs Quantification · Evidence status: ESTIMATE / CONDITIONAL — sources per line · Version: 1.0.1 · Editing Protocol

About this page type → Read the Docs#damages

ConstraintEntry
StatusResearch support, not legal advice; figures are indicative until valued by a RICS surveyor and reviewed by a solicitor.
LawEngland and Wales (applies in Wales).
MoneyToday’s £ (latest data: HPI Jul 2026; rents Aug 2026; Bank Rate Oct 2026).
ConditionsNo damages head is unconditional. Each needs title re-established, a register mistake proven, or fraud proven.
TotalsRoutes B1, B2 and C are alternatives. Do not add them.
LinksBusiness Case · Project Plan — cost table · Evidence Register · Reparations Schedule & Proposed Apportionment (heads of loss, pursuit-cost ledger, proposed shares, opportunity to remedy)

Summary

#HeadLegal basisLowCentralHighStatus
1Loss of the land (Parcel A)Sch 8 para 6; Smith New Court [1997] AC 254£621,000£2,809,000£4,096,000ESTIMATE · CONDITIONAL
2Mesne profits v BP, Dec 1988–Nov 1993Trespass; LA 1980 s.2, s.32£15,100£16,600£20,800ESTIMATE · CONDITIONAL
3Indemnity, register not rectified (incl. interest)LRA 2002 Sch 8; LRR 2003 r.195£165,100£746,700£1,350,000CONDITIONAL
4Deceit: land + loss of use 1988–2026 + interestSmith New Court; Doyle v Olby [1969] 2 QB 158£1,030,000£3,305,000£4,981,000CONDITIONAL
4d–eAggravated / exemplary damagesArcher v Brown [1985] QB 401; Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129; Kuddus [2001] UKHL 29TBCTBCTBCCONDITIONAL
5Distress, 5 personsShelley v Paddock [1980] QB 348£63,000£125,800£188,500ESTIMATE · CONDITIONAL
5cPersonal injuryMedical evidence———PENDING
6Consequential (livestock, business, contents)Smith New CourtTBCTBCTBCTBC
7Interests.35A SCA 1981; s.69 CCA 1984; r.195in 2–4in 2–4in 2–4QUANTIFIED (basis)
8Sion’s time as litigant in personCPR 46.5; PD 46 para 3.4£6,480£13,000£25,900ESTIMATE (hours TBC)
9Project costs to date and to comeCPR 46.5(3)(a)(ii); Sch 8 para 3Project Plan — cost table——see Plan

Totals by route

RouteHeadsLowCentralHighCondition
A8 (+9)£6,480£13,000£25,900Unconditional on fraud/rectification. Needs a costs order. Gmail time proxy ≈200–203 h composing time (ESTIMATE) ≈ £4,870 at £24/h: a floor, see head 8.
B11 + 2 + interest on 2 + 8£661,900£2,866,000£4,202,000Title restored (judgment set aside or register rectified), no fraud finding.
B23 + 8£171,600£759,600£1,376,000Register mistake proven; not rectified.
C4 + 5 + 8£1,099,000£3,444,000£5,196,000Fraud proven. Plus 4d–e, 5c, 6 (TBC). Replaces B1/B2.

1. Loss of the land

ItemValueSource
Parcel A area≈10 acres (4.05 ha)Mary (Nancy) Williams, statement c.1974, on The Two Parcels; “10-acre” block [EV-0075]; “ten-acre site” [EV-0106]
Parcel A partshouse/garden; woodland; south-east ground (VG41)Three Parts of Parcel A (family reconstruction). Areas of each part: TBC
Parcel B≈9 acres; not quantifiedMary (Nancy) Williams, witness statement c.1974 (Mary (Nancy) Williams testimony): retained by Bute, “given up later” (The Two Parcels); 1939 plan [EV-0023]
Built on site20 detached houses, 92/00671/RES[EV-0127] [EV-0135]
Church View Close, CF64 2NNnos. 1–20, detached; 16 new-build sales Feb 1995–Apr 1997, mean £120,906HMLR Price Paid: Church View Close, Penarth. Same site as [EV-0135]: count and dates match; plan match TBC
Recent salesNo.14 £480,000 (28 Jun 2021); No.6 £528,000 (24 Oct 2024)HMLR Price Paid: Church View Close, Penarth
Vale detached, Jul 2026avg £539,042; index 106.1UK HPI, Vale of Glamorgan
House value today (low / central / high)£528,000 / £551,929 / £605,5652024 sale as sold / 2024 sale indexed / 2021 sale indexed (Vale detached HPI)
Land share of developed value20% / 25% / 33%ESTIMATE: residual-method range; valuer to set
Cross-checkPenarth residual £1.7m/ha (2010, 40% affordable, 40 dph); ×1.80 Vale HPI 2010→Jul 2026 ≈ £3.06m/haVale of Glamorgan Viability Study 2010 para 3.13ff; index ESTIMATE
Undeveloped remainder≈6 acresESTIMATE: 10 acres less built plots; TBC by plan
Agricultural value£6,100 / £8,200 / £9,900 per acreSavills, GB Farmland, Summer 2025: England poorer pasture / GB average / England prime arable, H1 2025; Wales values unchanged H1 2025
LineMethodLowCentralHigh
1a Developed value (context; not a loss)20 × house value£10,560,000£11,039,000£12,111,000
1b Development land1a × land share£2,112,000£2,760,000£4,037,000
1c Remainder (woodland, green)6 acres × £/acre£36,600£49,200£59,400
1d Existing-use value (alternative)Vale detached avg + 10 acres × £8,200£621,000——
Head 1Low = 1d; central/high = 1b + 1c£621,000£2,809,000£4,096,000

Dependencies: title re-established (1987 judgment [EV-0080] set aside, or register rectified). LA 1980 s.15 (12 years to recover land) and s.17 (title extinguished), unless Limitation Act 1980 s.32 postpones. s.32(3): no recovery of property or its value from an innocent purchaser for value (current owners). Rectification against a proprietor in possession needs consent unless Sch 4 para 3(2)/6(2) applies (LRA 2002 Sch 4).

2. Mesne profits / loss of use

ItemValueSource
Rent, Vale, Aug 2026detached £1,341/month; 4+ bed £1,478/monthONS, Housing prices in the Vale of Glamorgan
High case£1,848/monthESTIMATE: 4+ bed +25% (10-room farmhouse with garden; no ONS series)
Backcastrent(t) = rent(Aug 2026) × Wales HPI(t) ÷ Wales HPI(Jul 2026)UK HPI, Wales; constant-yield assumption: ESTIMATE
Dispossession29/30 Nov 1988Master Timeline; [EV-0106]
BP in possession to3 Dec 1993 (transfer to Ideal Homes)Land Registry Titles
Woodland and VG41 groundtaken 4 Jul 1955 (family reconstruction)Three Parts of Parcel A. Loss of use: TBC (no grazing-rent source)
LinePeriodLowCentralHigh
2a Against BPDec 1988 – Nov 1993£15,100£16,600£20,800
2b Full period (deceit measure; used in Head 4)Dec 1988 – Oct 2026£308,800£340,300£425,400
2c Last 6 years only (no s.32)Nov 2020 – Oct 2026£89,700£98,900£123,600

Legal basis: mesne profits are damages for trespass by a person in possession without right, measured at the ordinary letting value (Inverugie Investments v Hackett [1995] 1 WLR 713). Dependencies: title re-established; claim lies against whoever was in possession (BP 1988–93; Ideal Homes 1993–95; homeowners after); LA 1980 s.2 (6 years) unless s.32.

3. Rectification and indemnity

RuleEffect
LRA 2002 Sch 4 paras 2–3, 5–6Register may be rectified to correct a mistake; not against a proprietor in possession without consent unless fraud/lack of care or unjust not to.
LRA 2002 Sch 8 para 1(1)(a)Indemnity for loss caused by rectification (runs to whoever loses on rectification).
Sch 8 para 1(1)(b), para 6(b)Mistake not rectified: indemnity value capped at value when the mistake was made.
Sch 8 para 5No indemnity for own fraud; reduced for own lack of proper care.
Sch 8 para 3Costs only if incurred with the registrar’s consent.
Sch 8 para 8Simple contract debt: 6 years from when the claimant knew or ought to have known.
LRR 2003 r.195Simple interest. Before 10 Nov 2008: judgment-debt rate. From 10 Nov 2008: Bank Rate + 1%. None for periods without due diligence (r.195(3)).
ItemValueSource
Date of suspected mistake23 Feb 1983 (first registration, WA240304)[PENDING: EV-0066]; Form 1C [PENDING: EV-0063]; schedule [EV-0161]
Law in force in 1983Land Registration Act 1925Transitional application of Sch 8 to a 1983 mistake: solicitor to confirm (TBC)
Index Feb 1983 → Jul 20268.5 → 106.5 (×0.0798)UK HPI, Wales
Judgment-debt rate12% to 15 Apr 1985; 15% to 31 Mar 1993; 8% from 1 Apr 19938%: SI 1993/564. 12% and 15%: ESTIMATE (orders not opened)
Bank Ratemonthly series; 3.75% Oct 2026BoE Bank Rate
LineMethodLowCentralHigh
3a RectifiedLand returned: value = Head 1———
3b Value at 23 Feb 1983Head 1 × 0.0798£49,600£224,200£327,000
3c Interest, r.195Low/central from 1 Dec 1988 (loss date ESTIMATE); high from 1 Mar 1983£115,500£522,500£1,023,000
Head 33b + 3c£165,100£746,700£1,350,000

4. Deceit (CONDITIONAL on fraud)

LineBasisLowCentralHigh
4a Land — CONDITIONALHead 1£621,000£2,809,000£4,096,000
4b Loss of use 1988–2026 — CONDITIONALLine 2b£308,800£340,300£425,400
4c Interest on 4b — CONDITIONALSenior Courts Act 1981 s.35A: Bank Rate / +1% / 8%£99,900£156,100£459,400
4d Aggravated — CONDITIONALArcher v Brown [1985] QB 401TBCTBCTBC
4e Exemplary — CONDITIONALRookes v Barnard cat. 1 (oppressive acts of government servants) or 2 (conduct calculated to profit); Kuddus [2001] UKHL 29TBCTBCTBC
Head 44a + 4b + 4c£1,030,000£3,305,000£4,981,000

Measure: all loss directly flowing from the fraud, including consequential loss (Smith New Court v Scrimgeour Vickers [1997] AC 254; Doyle v Olby [1969] 2 QB 158). 4e cat. 2 is measured against the defendant’s profit: developed value £11,039,000 (1a) less land and build cost; build cost not held (TBC). Dependencies: fraud proven to the civil standard; 1987 judgment set aside (Takhar v Gracefield [2019] UKSC 13; RBS v Highland [2013] EWCA Civ 328); Limitation Act 1980 s.32(1)(a) runs from discovery or reasonable diligence; s.32(3) bars recovery of property or its value from innocent purchasers; no double recovery with Heads 1–3.

5. Personal harm

ItemValueSource
LawDistress recoverable in deceit (Shelley v Paddock [1980] QB 348); in contract only within Watts v Morrow [1991] 1 WLR 1421 and Farley v Skinner [2001] UKHL 49; aggravated damages in tort (Head 4d).
AnalogyVento bands: £1,300–£12,600; £12,600–£37,700; £37,700–£62,900Vento bands, Ninth Addendum (2026). Employment tribunal only; analogy, not a tariff
Persons5: William, Branwen and three children[EV-0106]. Living claimants / estates: TBC
Per person£12,600 / £25,150 / £37,700ESTIMATE: Vento middle band floor / midpoint / top
LineLowCentralHighStatus
5a Distress × 5£63,000£125,800£188,500ESTIMATE · CONDITIONAL
5b Personal injury (William taken to Llandough Hospital after eviction, Nov 1988)———PENDING: medical evidence

6. Consequential losses

LossStatusNote
LivestockTBCNo wiki record found (searched: livestock, cattle, sheep, horses, pigs, dairy).
Farm or other business incomeTBCSion to supply.
Contents, belongings, removal, storageTBCSion to supply.
Rehousing (bus, 1989; rent paid since)TBCPress, 1989 (Master Timeline); amounts not held.

7. Interest

BasisRuleUsed in
Senior Courts Act 1981 s.35ASimple interest at the rate the court thinks fit, from cause of action to judgment (High Court).2, 4c
County Courts Act 1984 s.69Same power in the county court.2, 4c
Judgments Act 1838 s.178% from 1 Apr 1993 (SI 1993/564); runs after judgment. Used here only as the high sensitivity.4c high
LRR 2003 r.195Indemnity interest (above).3c
BoE Bank RateMonthly average of daily Bank Rate, 1983–Oct 2026.3c, 4c

8. Sion’s time as litigant in person

RuleEffect
CPR 46.5(2)Costs capped at two-thirds of what a legal representative would have been allowed (not half).
CPR 46.5(4)(a); PD 46 para 3.2Proven financial loss for time reasonably spent; written evidence served 24 hours before the hearing.
CPR 46.5(4)(b); PD 46 para 3.4No proven loss: £24 per hour (was £19 before 1 Oct 2025).
CPR 46.5(3)(a)Only work and disbursements a lawyer would have been allowed for.
CPR 44.2Costs are discretionary; a costs order in Sion’s favour is required.
ItemValueSource
Earliest dated email16 Aug 2016, from Sion’s address16 Aug 2016 (Date header)
Archive585 records; 227 texts readable; 111 with a Date header; 91 sent by Sion (2016: 1; 2025: 15; 2026: 75)email.bucklerfamily.estate, read 18 Oct 2026
Dated items by month2016-08 1 · 2024-02 1 · 2025-10 2 · 2025-11 14 · 2025-12 1 · 2026-01 4 · 2026-02 49 · 2026-03 3 · 2026-04 3 · 2026-05 17 · 2026-10 16same
Sustained period5 Oct 2025 – 18 Oct 2026 = 54 weeksfirst dated item of the current run, same archive
Hours per weekTBC (Sion). ESTIMATE 5 / 10 / 20
Gmail time proxy (ESTIMATE)488 case emails sent, 23 Mar 2016 – 18 Oct 2026; 477 in the run from 1 Oct 2025 (47 active weeks, ≈239,600 words). Composing time at 20 words/min: ≈200 h (run from Oct 2025), ≈203 h (all years) → ≈£4,870 at £24/h. Floor only: excludes research, archive visits, FOIs, calls and wiki work. A proxy, not a timesheet; some 2026 emails were drafted with AI help.Sion’s Gmail, read-only count, 18 Oct 2026 (I-015)
Cap illustration⅔ × £142 = £94.67/h (Grade D); ⅔ × £295 = £196.67/h (Grade A)Guideline hourly rates 2026, National 1 (Cardiff Inner)
LineFormulaLowCentralHigh
8a £24 limb, 54 weekshours/week × 54 × £24£6,480 (270 h)£12,960 (540 h)£25,920 (1,080 h)
8b Proven-loss limbhours × proven hourly loss, ≤ ⅔ lawyer-equivalentTBCTBC (ceiling at 540 h: £51,120–£106,200)TBC
8c 16 Aug 2016 – 4 Oct 2025hours × £24TBCTBCTBC
RecoverableNot recoverable
Time reasonably spent on work a lawyer would do in the proceedings, after a costs order.Time without a costs order in Sion’s favour.
Pre-action work only so far as it is costs of and incidental to the proceedings later brought.General research, campaigning, FOI and wiki work not tied to the proceedings.
Disbursements (official copies, court fees).Other family members’ time (not Sion’s costs).
Indemnity route: costs incurred with the registrar’s consent (Sch 8 para 3).Indemnity route: costs without that consent, unless urgent or later approved.

9. Project costs

Costs to date and to come: Project Plan — cost table. Recoverable as disbursements only under a costs order (CPR 46.5(3)(a)(ii)); on the indemnity route only with the registrar’s consent (Sch 8 para 3).

Inputs needed from Sion

InputUsed in
Hours per week and periods worked; any lost earnings with evidence8
Medical evidence (William; any family member)5b
Livestock, business, contents, removal, rehousing costs6
Living claimants and estates (grant of representation)5, 4
Plan areas of the three parts of Parcel A1, 2

Browse mirror index