GHF-E188 — Heneb / HER statement on FOI requests, 22 May 2026
PUBLIC EVIDENCE PREVIEW · Version 1.0.0
GHF-E188 — Heneb / HER statement on FOI requests
TRANSCRIPT PENDING — this is not the original email thread. The full original message bodies, sender/recipient headers and attachments have not yet been captured into this public page. The material below is a clearly labelled catalogue summary only; no private Gmail link is provided.
Catalogue chronology (not a transcript): approach dated 20 May 2026 and a 22 May reply from the HER address. The catalogue records the reply as stating Heneb was not subject to FOI requests because it was a limited company and inviting use of its enquiry form. Exact wording remains to be checked against the original.
Versioning: 1.0.0 is the initial published evidence-page version. Increment MINOR when correspondence or attachments are added; PATCH for corrections to presentation, metadata or redactions; MAJOR only if the identity or scope of the evidence object changes. Record every change in the version history below.
Whole-thread description (collapsed)
Catalogue chronology (not a transcript): approach dated 20 May 2026 and a 22 May reply from the HER address. The catalogue records the reply as stating Heneb was not subject to FOI requests because it was a limited company and inviting use of its enquiry form. Exact wording remains to be checked against the original. This description is based on existing correspondence-catalogue notes, not a verified verbatim transcript. Message order, exact wording, dates, sender/recipient fields, quoted history and attachments must be checked against the original source before the thread can be represented as fully captured.
Evidence version history
- 1.0.0 — 17 October 2026: initial public evidence record. Catalogue summary displayed; original email transcript and attachments pending. Private mailbox URLs excluded.
Evidence class: Email correspondence (Gmail thread). Catalogue ID: GHF-E188. Record status: placeholder / source capture pending.
Source: original correspondence held by the author; source export and full headers not yet published. Private mailbox URLs are intentionally omitted. Catalogue ID: GHF-E188.
Important source-status note: The original Gmail message bodies and attachments have not yet been copied or transcribed into this Wiki evidence page. The description below is a provisional neutral summary of the existing correspondence-catalogue notes, not a verbatim transcript. Dates, senders, recipients, attachments and exact wording must be checked against the original Gmail thread before this entry is treated as a fully captured artifact.
1. Evidence object and provenance
Object sought: the complete Gmail conversation identified above, including original sent/received messages, timestamps, sender and recipient fields, subject line, quoted material, and any attachments or linked files. The stable catalogue ID for this thread is GHF-E188.
Current custody record: the existing Wiki catalogue names Gmail as the source and records the thread ID. No independent export, full-header capture, attachment manifest or hash has yet been recorded on this page. The public Wiki entry is a finding aid and interpretive record; it is not a substitute for the Gmail original.
2. Neutral description of the correspondence
The current catalogue records a multi-recipient approach on 20 May 2026 that included Heneb. It then records a 22 May reply from the HER address stating: “Heneb is not subject to FOI requests as we are a Limited company. However, if you fill out our Enquiry Form then we will be happy to assist as best we can.” The catalogue says the family acknowledged the reply. The original thread is needed to confirm the complete text, context, addressees and any accompanying request.
Description basis: current Heneb / HER correspondence catalogue and linked institutional review, as recorded on 17 October 2026. This is a summary of the presently recorded chronology, not a claim that the original source has been independently re-read for this page.
3. Interpretation — what the evidence may mean
If confirmed, the message establishes Heneb’s stated position at that time and its suggested alternative enquiry route. It is evidence of the organisation’s assertion, not an independent legal determination that the Environmental Information Regulations or other access provisions do or do not apply. Any legal assessment must be made separately against the applicable legislation, functions and facts.
4. Limits, verification and next evidence-capture steps
- Retrieve the identified thread from Gmail and check every message in its original order, including internal headers, timestamps, subject, quoted history, attachments and any linked documents.
- Export or otherwise preserve a faithful source copy; record the capture date, file names, formats and cryptographic hashes. Keep the mailbox original unchanged.
- Replace this provisional summary only after checking the original messages. Where the message wording is quoted, use a faithful transcription and mark omissions or illegible portions explicitly.
- Separate what the email directly records from the sender’s assertions, the recipient’s response, later events and any inference. A missing reply or attachment in the current Wiki catalogue is a retrieval gap, not proof that it never existed.
Related records: Heneb / HER correspondence catalogue — Thread 6 · Heneb — Forensic Institutional Review · Evidence Library.
Assessment cut-off: 17 October 2026. Catalogue status is provisional until the original Gmail thread and any attachments are captured and verified.
Change history is maintained on the Master Change Log; no separate page-local version footer is maintained.