South Western Brick & Tile Company — Forensic Assessment
This material now lives at https://fcg.bucklerfamily.estate/case/south-western-brick-and-tile-forensic-institutional-review.
Assessed 14 October 2026. Scope: documented appearance in one 1961 deed. The company is historic. Inclusion is not a finding of fault.
Documented appearances
| Date | Appearance | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 29 March 1961 | Party to a deed with Western Ground Rents Ltd and Cardiff City (on the WA231076 first-registration schedule). | GHF-E129 |
| 1 Dec 1972; 30 Apr 1974 | “South Western Brick and Tile Company Limited” named in Companies Registry lists under s.353 Companies Act 1948 (probably a strike-off warning, then struck off and dissolved; the two-column layout leaves the heading uncertain). Whether it is the same company as the 1961 deed party is unconfirmed. | London Gazette, 1 Dec 1972, p.14299; 30 Apr 1974, p.5330 (read by Tab’s research, flywheel cycle 13, 19 Oct 2026) |
Current finding
As at 14 October 2026, the material reviewed does not establish wrongdoing by the company. The catalogue records the deed; its operative terms and plan have not been read for this review, so what land it concerned and how it relates to the farm parcels is not established here.
Next step
Obtain the deed through HM Land Registry (Form OC2) and read its plan against the two-parcel map. Check Companies House and the limeworks material for the company’s operations. Acceptance: the deed’s land and purpose are stated and sourced.
Related
Western Ground Rents review · Cardiff City Council review · Llandough Limeworks
Created 14 October 2026. Prepared with AI assistance from the wiki’s existing records, on the family’s instruction. Corrections are welcome and will be dated here.
Related analysis and change record / guest book — 18 October 2026
Added the 1961 deed as a priority record for the institutional chronology. The company’s appearance in a deed establishes a role only to the extent the authenticated instrument shows; it does not itself establish wrongdoing. See the Three-part Parcel A: chronology, order scope and later title transfers assessment for the cross-parcel chronology, competing explanations and prioritized document list.
Change record: Added this cross-reference and a dated guest-book entry to connect this page to the new three-part Parcel A analysis. This is an editorial synthesis of existing leads, not a newly discovered primary record or a finding of fraud.
Cross-reference — Cedwyn Estate working theory: The 29 March 1961 deed is a potentially relevant lead for the Cedwyn Estate / woodland hypothesis. Until the complete deed and plan are inspected, it is evidence of a catalogued transaction, not proof that Parcel A land was unlawfully conveyed, that Mary’s title was known to the parties, or that the 1949 and 1961 events were coordinated. See the Cedwyn Estate Working Theory.
Change history is maintained on the Master Change Log; no separate page-local version footer is maintained.