Information Commissioner’s Office — correspondence with the family (email)
| Title | Information Commissioner’s Office: correspondence with the family (email) |
|---|---|
| Evidence label | CORRESPONDENCE (email thread) |
| Institution | Information Commissioner’s Office |
| Date range | 21 Jul 2026 – 21 Jul 2026 |
| Messages published | 1: 1 from Sion Buckler (trimmed to the farm case), 0 from the institution side (0 automatic replies listed by header only) |
| Not published | 10 on unrelated personal matters; 1 unsent draft |
| Status | HELD: Sion Buckler’s Gmail, read-only export, 18 Oct 2026 |
| Provenance | Message text verbatim. Email addresses, phone numbers, postal addresses and signature blocks removed; earlier quoted replies trimmed. Message numbers follow the full export, so gaps are messages not published. Selection: the institution’s email domains plus case terms; check for misses. Sion’s own messages trimmed to the farm case on 18 Oct 2026: personal passages omitted at the family’s request and marked “[personal passage omitted — not about the farm case]”; institutions’ words unchanged. |
| Related | — |
About this page type → Read the Docs
Proves: What was sent and received, by whom and on what dates, as held in Sion’s mailbox.
Does not prove: That any statement inside an email is true; that the mailbox holds every message (letters, calls and other addresses are outside it); any motive.
1. Description
- 1 messages published, 21 Jul 2026 to 21 Jul 2026: 1 from Sion Buckler, 0 from the ICO (0 automatic).
- Reply times below are mechanical: the gap from each email Sion sent to the next non-automatic message from the institution. A reply may answer a different email. Read with section 2.
2. Evidence: the emails
M09 · 21 Jul 2026 17:24 UTC · Sion Buckler · Buckler vs United Kingdom
Sir/Madam,
I am requesting your urgent assistance and referral to the appropriate
oversight bodies regarding serious and ongoing difficulties obtaining
historic records required for my family’s claim concerning Great House Farm
(Tŷ Mawr), Llandough, Vale of Glamorgan.
I want to be clear that I am not asking you to determine the underlying
ownership dispute. That is a matter for legal adjudication. I am requesting
assistance to ensure that the documentary evidence required for a fair
legal determination is identified, preserved and made available.
The Information Commissioner’s Office has advised that this matter requires
referral through my Member of Parliament. Who doesn’t reply. The Llandough
councillor doesn’t reply. I follow up monthly and nothing. [personal passage omitted — not about the farm case]
After more than a year of attempting to obtain records through Freedom of
Information requests, Environmental Information Regulations requests,
archive enquiries and correspondence with relevant bodies, I have
encountered repeated difficulties which are preventing proper assessment of
my family’s claim. South Wales Police say they don’t hold records yet they
were reported by ITV and other news outlets as being heavily involved in
the dispossession of our land and home in 1988. Before our 80p year old
home was abruptly demolished and our land and home since 1667 seized .
Along with all our furniture, artwork etc, originally from Cardiff castle.
Property and reference information
The matter concerns:
*Great House Farm / Tŷ Mawr*
Llandough, Vale of Glamorgan
Relevant Land Registry titles:
– WA231076
– WA240304
Historic Ordnance Survey references:
– [removed]
There appear to be significant gaps in the documentary chain concerning the
transition from historic family occupation, later possession arrangements,
registration, and subsequent transfer of interests.
My family’s understanding is that there may have been separate interests
relating to the occupied farmhouse/plot and surrounding leased land.
Clarification of the documentary evidence concerning historic title,
occupation, registration and possession is therefore essential.
A key unresolved issue is the evidential gap between historic occupation
and the later registration position, including the documents relied upon
when registration occurred and the subsequent handling of title
documentation.
I also note Marconi stayed with us while inventing radio. A Roman villa and
monestry existed there too and has never been formally even attempted to be
discovered. [personal passage omitted — not about the farm case]
Fraud unravels all. And the limitation is from discovery not occurance of
it. I alledge fraud. Fraud and consealment. BP should have least told the
land registry we challenged their claim with our claim to the land.
Records requiring identification, preservation and disclosure
The records required include, but are not limited to:
Land ownership and registration
– The complete title registration files and supporting documents for
WA231076 and WA240304.
– Application documents submitted for registration.
– Supporting deeds, conveyances, evidence of title, correspondence and
internal notes.
– Any records showing how historic interests were considered during
registration.
– Records concerning Western Ground Rents, BP Pension Trust Ltd and BP
Properties Ltd.
Court and legal records
– Records relating to possession proceedings from 1955.
– Records relating to the [removed] possession order.
– Documents connected with:
*BP Properties Ltd v Buckler [1987] EWCA Civ 2*
Including:
– pleadings;
– exhibits;
– correspondence;
– administrative records;
– any associated court documents.
Occupation and possession records
– Correspondence and documents relating to occupation/licence
arrangements around 1974.
– Records concerning communications with members of the Williams/Buckler
family.
– Notices, agreements, applications and internal decision records.
Public authority and heritage records
–
Council records relating to Great House Farm.
–
Police records relating to events surrounding the property, where held.
–
Cadw records including:
– inspection records;
– listing consideration records;
– photographs dated 29 July 1988;
– demolition-related correspondence.
–
Archaeological records including:
– 1978–1980 investigations;
– 1994 excavations;
– reports;
– correspondence;
– site records;
– photographs.
Demolition records
All records relating to the demolition of Great House Farm in December
1988, including:
– permissions;
– correspondence;
– photographs;
– reports;
– decision records.
Concerns regarding record handling
My concern is not simply that some records are unavailable. The concern is
that repeated requests have resulted in responses which:
– do not address the information requested;
– answer different questions from those asked;
– fail to explain what searches were undertaken;
– state that records cannot be located without identifying where
searches were carried out;
– describe records as missing, unavailable or destroyed without
explaining:
– when this occurred;
– under what retention policy;
– who authorised disposal;
– whether alternative copies exist.
This creates a serious barrier to obtaining legal advice and pursuing a
lawful determination of my family’s claim.
Request for intervention
I respectfully request assistance with:
1. Referral through the appropriate ICO escalation route.
2. Ensuring relevant public bodies conduct documented and comprehensive
searches.
3. Obtaining explanations for any records stated to be missing,
destroyed or unavailable.
4. Ensuring potentially relevant records are preserved.
5. Raising concerns regarding historic public record management with the
appropriate oversight bodies.
The relevant oversight routes may include:
– Information Commissioner’s Office (FOI/EIR compliance);
– Audit Wales (public body governance and accountability);
– Welsh public services complaints mechanisms;
– National Archives (public records management);
– Independent Office for Police Conduct, where appropriate;
– Any other appropriate authority where evidence indicates further
action is required.
Urgency
This matter is urgent because the continuing absence of documentary
evidence is preventing proper legal assessment of the claim. I am concerned
that further delay may prejudice my family’s ability to seek legal remedies
within applicable limitation periods.
I can provide:
– a complete chronology of requests and responses;
– FOI reference numbers;
– copies of correspondence;
– evidence indexes;
– supporting historical documentation.
I request confirmation within 10 working days that this matter has been
reviewed and that appropriate referrals have been made.
Yours sincerely,
Sion Buckler [personal passage omitted — not about the farm case]
—-
Appendix A — Great House Farm (Tŷ Mawr), Llandough — Evidence Access,
Records and Disclosure Chronology
Date / Period
Event / Issue
Records required / outstanding
Relevant body / holder
Disclosure concern
1667 onwards
Family occupation and claimed historic interest in Great House Farm / Tŷ
Mawr
Historic deeds, title evidence, manorial records, estate records,
occupation evidence
National Library of Wales, Glamorgan Archives, private estates, Land
Registry
Documentary chain required to establish historic occupation and interests
Pre-1876
Family occupation and relationship with surrounding leased land
Lease documents, rent records, estate correspondence, maps
Estate archives / Glamorgan Archives / NLW
Need clarification of distinction between occupied holding and leased
surrounding land
1876
Bute estate/Llandough Limeworks changes affecting surrounding land interests
Conveyances, leases, maps, estate records
Estate archives, NLW, archives
Need clarification of land boundaries and interests created
1897
Marconi wireless telegraphy experiments at Lavernock Point; claimed Cardiff
Post Office engineering connection
Employment records, Post Office/GPO records, correspondence, technical
records
BT Archives / National Archives / GPO records
Relevant historical context; records sought
1938
Auction catalogue referring to property and alleged “vacant possession”
Auction papers, catalogue, purchaser records, correspondence
Archives / estate records
Clarification required as family occupation appears to have continued
1950s
Alleged continued occupation and dispute over possession
Rent records, notices, correspondence, court documents
Landowners, courts, archives
Evidence needed regarding legal basis of possession claims
1955
Possession proceedings
Claim documents, pleadings, evidence, orders, correspondence
Court archives
Full records required
[removed]
Court file, order, evidence relied upon
Court archive
Need complete context and documents relied upon
1969
Western Ground Rents / BP Pension Trust involvement
Conveyances, transfers, title documents, correspondence
Land Registry, company records, archives
Need chain of ownership/interests
Early 1970s
Alleged change in occupation/legal status
Correspondence, internal notes, notices
BP-related entities, council, archives
Clarification of decisions affecting occupation
1971
Alleged Ordnance Survey descriptor changes
OS historical mapping records and revision information
Ordnance Survey
Need confirmation of mapping history
1974
Licence/occupation correspondence involving “Mrs Buckler”
All letters, agreements, internal correspondence, decision records
BP-related bodies / council / archives
Need clarification of legal basis and parties involved
1978–1980
Archaeological investigations
Excavation reports, photographs, correspondence, site records
Glamorgan-Gwent Archaeological Trust / RCAHMW / Cadw
Complete archive required
1982
Land Registry registration
Full application bundle for WA231076
HM Land Registry
Critical issue: supporting evidence and documents used for registration
1982 onwards
WA231076 title history
Title documents, filed deeds, correspondence, applications
HM Land Registry
FOI confirmed registration but underlying evidence requires clarification
1980s
Land Registry title changes / later title WA240304
Complete title history and supporting documents
HM Land Registry
Need complete chain
1987
BP Properties Ltd v Buckler [1987] EWCA Civ 2
Pleadings, exhibits, transcripts, correspondence, administrative records
Court archives
Required for understanding legal issues determined
29 July 1988
Cadw photographs/inspection material
Photographs, inspection notes, listing consideration records
Cadw
Cadw confirmed photographs but wider record availability unclear
1988
Demolition of Great House Farm (December 1988)
Permissions, notices, correspondence, photographs, reports
Council, Cadw, archives
Need complete decision trail
1994
Archaeological excavations
Reports, photographs, archive material
Archaeological bodies / RCAHMW
Need complete record
2025–2026
FOI/EIR requests commenced
All requests and responses
Multiple public bodies
Repeated issues with incomplete answers
2025–2026
Requests to archives, councils, heritage bodies, Land Registry and others
Search records, explanations, retention policies
Relevant organisations
Need details of searches undertaken
2025–2026
Land Registry FOI response (reference previously noted: F260213)
Registration confirmation and refusal of bundle disclosure
HM Land Registry
Need alternative access route to filed documents
2025–2026
Cadw correspondence
Listing/demolition records
Cadw
Records reportedly incomplete/pre-digitisation gaps
2025–2026
RCAHMW correspondence
Held archive material (14 archive items referenced)
RCAHMW
Need identification/access to all relevant records
2025–2026
Glamorgan Archives response
Archive searches regarding demolition/legal records
Glamorgan Archives
Need clarity on search scope
2025–2026
Vale of Glamorgan Council responses
Council records
Council
Need confirmation of departments searched
2025–2026
South Wales Police records request
Incident/event records if held
South Wales Police
Need search explanation and retention information
2025–2026
ITV archive footage issue
Broadcast/archive material relating to events
ITV
Need archive request route; not FOI-accessible
2026
ICO advice
Referral through MP route
ICO
Escalation required
Outstanding disclosure questions;
What documents were submitted to HM Land Registry to create title WA231076?
What evidence of title was accepted?
What happened to any earlier deeds or documentary evidence?
Why were some records unavailable when requested?
Were any relevant records destroyed?
If destroyed:
when?
by whom?
under what retention policy?
with what authorisation?
Were duplicate copies retained elsewhere?
Which departments, databases, archives and physical collections were
searched?
Who conducted those searches?
Are any records currently subject to preservation holds?
3. Interpretation (Sion Buckler’s reading)
Not yet given by the family. When added, each point will cite the message it relies on (section 2) and note anything the emails do not bear out.