EV-0132 — 1994 Cotswold Archaeology report, Condition 18 discharge and developer’s counsel’s opinion
| EV ID | EV-0132 |
|---|---|
| Title | 1994 Cotswold Archaeology report, Condition 18 discharge and developer’s counsel’s opinion |
| Date of document | 1993–94 (post-excavation demand December 1994) |
| Type | survey/report |
| Evidence label | PRIMARY DOCUMENT — NOT YET HELD |
| Repository / reference | Cotswold Archaeology / Heneb; Vale of Glamorgan Council; Home Office licence file |
| Status | PENDING — Holders named as Cotswold Archaeology / Heneb, Vale of Glamorgan Council, and Home Office licence file; Called ‘a priority missing original’; No method or cost given. |
| Provenance | No copy held; Placeholder entry with ‘Evidence object area: none yet’. No preview or transcription existed; Source link points only to bucklerfamily.estate. |
| Wiki catalogue page | GHF-E148 |
| Claims that rely on this | GGAT — Forensic Assessment and Evidence Schedule v4.0.3 (full text), Home Office — Forensic Assessment, Ideal Homes Wales — Forensic Assessment, Vale of Glamorgan Council — Forensic Assessment, Welsh Office / Wales Office — Forensic Assessment |
About this page type → Read the Docs
Quotation: “a difference of opinion”
Proves: Not held, so nothing yet. Reported: 1,026 burials published, Home Office licence lapsed 21 April–3 May 1994, and Condition 18 treated as discharged on counsel’s opinion over GGAT’s objection.
Does not prove: Does not establish what was removed during the licence lapse or under what authority, the authority for the April 1994 ‘no further work’ instruction, the text of counsel’s opinion, or why the historic-environment record shows 858 burials rather than 1,026.